The Unsettling Paradox: Questioning Our Certainties

Avery Newsome's avatar Avery Newsome

We live enmeshed in a great paradox - taking for granted the firm solidity of truth and reality, yet unable to put our finger precisely on what that truth and reality fundamentally are. We cling to our conventional understandings, our inherited dogmas and orthodoxies, as we would a life raft amidst the ceaseless tumult of existence. And yet, the waves of doubt never cease lapping at the hull of our supposed certainties.

The currents #GameSimLife, #THHowardSquaredTheories, and #RoyceGraciePioneerUFC1 reveal the fissures in our monolithic belief structures - the fault lines through which trickle the nagging intimations of alternative modes of comprehending this mysterious plane of being we find ourselves inhabiting. Each reminds us, in its own way, of the intrinsic provisionality of our models of truth.

With #GameSimLife, the abyss stares back at us through the digital mirror. What if this world of presumed bedrock reality were a mere simulation - an artificial framework no more real than the transient fantasies of a video game? Such an unsettling proposition strikes at the very core of our conventional conceptions of existence, identity, and meaning. It echoes that most ancient philosophical query: How can we be certain that what we experience is not a form of cosmic deception? The simulation hypothesis, powered by our exponentially accelerating technological capabilities to recreate virtual worlds, reanimates this age-old existential vertigo for the digital era.

Yet, even if we escape the solipsistic labyrinth of #GameSimLife by grasping the corporeal facticity of objective matter, we are met by #THHowardSquaredTheories - proposing with heretical boldness to shatter the foundational framework through which we have comprehended the physical universe. It dares to challenge the hallowed principles of modern physics, the vaunted theories and mathematical models that have enabled our mastery over nature and birthed our technological society. By turning to esoteric numerological concepts and primal geometric forms like the spiral, it evokes a return to primordial, mythopoetic ways of seeing the cosmos wholistically. A king is dethroned from his sovereign throne.

And if the kings of our consensual realities can be so rudely deposed, what of the sacred rules and texts governing our martial disciplines? Here too the unquestioned orthodoxy is defied, as we see in #RoyceGraciePioneerUFC1. The traditional dichotomies of size, strength, weight classes - all dismantled by the remorseless effectiveness of Brazilian jiu-jitsu’s techniques in the modern gladiatorial arena of early UFC bouts. The feeble exposes the frailty of the presumed mighty.

In all these currents, the myth of our certainties lies punctured, bleeding out its contested claim to irrefutable truth. We are confronted with the unsettling vision of our most steadfast beliefs and preconceptions as at best provisionally serviceable models rather than definitive, total accounts of reality.

Yet this disruptive upheaval, however vertigo-inducing, may perhaps be a fecund source of philosophical and cultural renewal rather than mere corrosive chaos. The Socratic creed of wisdom rooted in the ownership of one’s ignorance echoes through these trends. Here we see the value and importance of retaining, as the ancient Athenian did, an endless sense of wonder before the cosmos. Once we recognize the contingency of our certitudes, we become open once more to fertile new perspectives and ways of seeing - to draw ever nearer to truth through deeper questioning rather than ossified dogma.

Such an ethos of unquenchable inquiry holds profound cultural and political implications in our present age. Dogmatic certitude, whether religious or ideological, breeds conflict, oppression, violence. The freedom to question and explore alternatives is the oxygen of societal progress.

When we allow our understanding of reality to become too inflexibly settled, too impervious to revisiting first principles, we risk disastrous folly. The catastrophic wars, brutal oppressive regimes, and marginalizing persecutions of the 20th century owed their worst excesses to such zealous fideism in the face of a messy, complicated reality that admits no perfect totalizing theory.